| Description | Hi,
actually we're in testing phase of bareos.
While setting up the environment and taking the first drives, i've took a notice about a strange behaviour in the automatic volume naming regarding the number at the end of the volume.
The environment:
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS
Release: 16.04
Codename: xenial
ii bareos-bconsole 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - text console
ii bareos-common 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - common files
ii bareos-database-common 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - common catalog files
ii bareos-database-mysql 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - MySQL backend
ii bareos-database-tools 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - database tools
ii bareos-director 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - director daemon
ii bareos-filedaemon 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - file daemon
ii bareos-filedaemon-python-plugin 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - file daemon Python plugin
ii bareos-storage 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - storage daemon
ii bareos-storage-fifo 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - storage daemon FIFO backend
ii bareos-storage-tape 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - storage daemon tape support
ii bareos-tools 16.2.4-12.1 amd64 Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - common tools
ii bareos-webui 16.2.4-31.1 all Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced - webui
The config layout:
We have 3 kind of pools: A, B, C
In each of these we have Incremental, Differential and Full.
# pool/Class_A_Incremental.conf
Pool {
Name = Class_A_Incremental
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 30 days
Maximum Volume Bytes = 10G
Maximum Volumes = 100
Label Format = "Class_A_Incremental-"
}
# pool/Class_A_Differential.conf
Pool {
Name = Class_A_Differential
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 30 days
Maximum Volume Bytes = 10G
Maximum Volumes = 100
Label Format = "Class_A_Differential-"
}
# pool/Class_A_Full.conf
Pool {
Name = Class_A_Full
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 30 days
Maximum Volume Bytes = 10G
Maximum Volumes = 100
Label Format = "Class_A_Full-"
}
# pool/Class_B_Incremental.conf
Pool {
Name = Class_B_Incremental
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 30 days
Maximum Volume Bytes = 10G
Maximum Volumes = 100
Label Format = "Class_B_Incremental-"
}
# pool/Class_C_Differential.conf
Pool {
Name = Class_C_Differential
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 30 days
Maximum Volume Bytes = 10G
Maximum Volumes = 100
Label Format = "Class_C_Differential-"
}
# pool/Class_C_Full.conf
Pool {
Name = Class_C_Full
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 30 days
Maximum Volume Bytes = 10G
Maximum Volumes = 100
Label Format = "Class_C_Full-"
}
Starting environment:
1) Stopped director and storage daemon via init.d
2) Dropped tables via drop_bareos_tables
3) Generated tables via make_bareos_tables
4) Deleted all .bsr, .state and bareos-dir.bareos-dir.* files under /var/lib/bareos/
5) Deleted any volumes physically
6) Started director and storage daemon via init.d
My expecting behaviour is, that if i run a full job that fills data in Pool_A_Full, it will generate a file called Class_A_Full-0001 and will append upcoming full data till the limits are reached.
If i do the same with Pool B, i expect that bareos creates a file called Class_B_Full-0001 and so on. The same for differential and incremental.
But bareos has other plans.
Ive started a full job within class B. He created the file Class_B_Full-0001. As expected.
Then ive started a full job within class C. He created the file Class_C_Full-0002. What the hell?
After this ive started a full A job. He created the file Class_A_Full-0003. Ehhhm?
The time between the 3 tests are max. 1 minute.
Is this behaviour as expected and im wrong with my guess?
Best regards
Jens |
|---|
