0001068: Wrong spec file for packaging

ID	Project	Category	View Status	Date Submitted	Last Update

0001068	bareos-core	installer / packages	public	2019-03-14 11:37	2023-07-14 14:18

Reporter	msartiaux	Assigned To	bruno-at-bareos
Priority	normal	Severity	minor	Reproducibility	always
Status	closed	Resolution	no change required
Platform	Linux	OS	CentOS	OS Version	7
Product Version	18.2.5

Summary	0001068: Wrong spec file for packaging
Description	The redhat spec file is missing some parameters Require cmake while the code need cmake3, cmake3 is not officially available through centos/redhat repo, cmake3 package from epel is mandatory to build (and create symlinks with update-alternatives to bind cmake3 to cmake executables) BuildRequire : libqt4-devel need to be changed to qt-devel lsb-release is not available on redhat/centos (package is named centos-release for centos (i guess it's redhat-release for rh7)) The whole section for bareos-webui (package, description & files) is not available so rpmbuild throw a warning for untracked files (webui files) while compiling the packages (to bypass the warning, add %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 in the spec file but webui is not going to be packaged) Docs are not included since they moved in the core folder Devel package is not buildable (wrong path for header files) I guess the spec file need to be updated since you merged python and webui repo into the bareos repository.
Tags	No tags attached.

msartiaux 2019-03-14 12:09 reporter ~0003292	Can't edit the description to fix my error : the package lsb-release is named redhat-lsb on centos & redhat

joergs 2019-07-02 16:57 developer ~0003404	After cloning the git repository, you have to "cd core" and build the package from there. There are seperate spec files for the webui and other packages. A combined SPEC file will come somewhen in the future. We use there spec files to build our packages (inside of a http://openbuildservice.org instance). So generally they do work.

bruno-at-bareos 2023-07-05 16:32 manager ~0005156	Is this still reproducible with supported version bareos 22 (current) and master (next) ?

bruno-at-bareos 2023-07-14 14:18 manager ~0005177	No answer, and not reproducible

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2019-03-14 11:37	msartiaux	New Issue
2019-03-14 12:09	msartiaux	Note Added: 0003292
2019-07-02 16:57	joergs	Note Added: 0003404
2019-07-02 16:57	joergs	Status	new => acknowledged
2023-07-05 16:32	bruno-at-bareos	Assigned To	=> bruno-at-bareos
2023-07-05 16:32	bruno-at-bareos	Status	acknowledged => feedback
2023-07-05 16:32	bruno-at-bareos	Note Added: 0005156
2023-07-14 14:18	bruno-at-bareos	Status	feedback => closed
2023-07-14 14:18	bruno-at-bareos	Resolution	open => no change required
2023-07-14 14:18	bruno-at-bareos	Note Added: 0005177